Here is the interview of an inspector de l' Education Nationale, who takes out a book It is necessary to close nursery schools :

In your book, you write that thing in the nursery school is not learnt often big and that on a day of school, a pupil will have accepted about 1 hour of training over 6 hours from class! . But what does he make during remaining 5 hours then?

He makes siesta, must go to toilets to group, makes pauses recesses, d shabille/se refreshes, lines up after activities in group A the nursery school, the children pass a lot of time to make something else than to teach.

Even if these are not purely intellectual activities, this time learns to the child to integrate with a community, to tell difference between week and weekends, home and school, no?

Yes, completely. But the child can learn socialisation in other structures, as kindergartens supervised by teachers. Does the State need to pay graduate teachers bac+5 not to make education? Personnels of supervision - teachers or animators - could be enough.

It would mean that the school would not be more than a service of reception

It is already case. The parents consider the nursery school to be a day nursery. Proof: when there is strike, they do not say slim, my child is going to learn nothing today but how I am going to make to make him keep? .

Besides, the school tries unsuccessfully to begin at 8 h 30, some parents take their children later, when this corresponds at the hour to which they leave at job. Or they go on a trip except school holiday and make a word then to the manager or the head of the school to say that their child will be away during fourteen days.

You tell off the fact that the children go to queue to toilets and that siesta is compulsory for everybody in the nursery school

Mind nursery school, it is: it is necessary all to make the same thing at the same time . And the adults in group are not forced to go all together at the same time to toilets. It would be better to encourage the children to go to toilets by taking at their time of break or by letting them go out if they want during the class. This autonomiserait more than of credit of such moutonniers behaviours.

For siesta, it is similar. Some children remain eyes opened during at all times by siesta because, at home, they do not make it. I think that it would more be necessary to respect the rhythm of the children because they do all not walk at the same speed.

You say that it would be necessary to lower the age of the schooling in 5 years (currently, the school is compulsory from 6 years). Why?

Because if they do not rethink the programmes of the year of 5 years, big section of nursery schools, they go to disaster. Currently, law says that in big section, the children have to practice at the same time activities of medium section of nursery school and of first year of primary school of the primary school. But it is very vague. The programme will depend on the constitution of classes and on the choice of the teachers.

Result: in PO BOX, the children have every no same acquisitions, some people can almost read and others were rather drawn downwards by making activities for smaller. In this direction, the school does not complete its mission to reduce inequality and does not give to the schoolchildren all chances to succeed well.

Source: 20 minutes

I find this completely scandalous. This man, who chose to keep anonymity to be sure of seeing my note augmenting d 1/4 of the point and so to change echelon in the seniority has surely no idea of what takes place in nursery schools. By assuming that there is only one hour of "school" training, he really thinks that a class crosses 5 h to make wee, in if habiller/se d habiller and to go to break? Certainly not. One to live together to discover its body, the time of group, every minute thinks by the teachers to learn to teach something to the pupils. But this job of shadow does not see itself willy-nilly in cash sounding and stumbling Of course they play, but training passes so thereabouts in this age (yes, the children are nicked, they think that they play, but in fact they work).

Besides, the big section of nursery school is included into cycle 2 (at the beginning of primary), the teachers do not make what they want, they have a programme!

He speaks about inequality of the pupils to the entrance in the PO BOX. I would really like to know what takes place if, as he asks for it, nursery schools were closed. Some parents would have the medium financiers and cultural to stimulate their child, to put him in a structure of reception, to work with him in the evening, to awaken him, and these children could then write their forename, make curls, to take only as some models of what is made in nursery school. While other children would arrive at the PO BOX without ever having known day nursery, nor having no notion of writing. She is where the equality of chances there?

And then in r flechissant, what this would bring back to close nursery schools or to put animators instead of the professors of schools? Ah well yes. A civil servant of category C costs less although a civil servant of category A

All this disgusts me.

Similar Posts:

• My big disillusions
• They believe in it A DEAD!
• Youth errors
• The horrible test of the ill cat
• Neuneu-girl